Elliot Spitzer has an affair with hot prostitute. Prostitute becomes famous/sings badly. Girls Gone Wild offers her lots of money to be in a video. GGW then discovers they already have tons of footage of her on video from 5 years ago. They get set to release said footage. Prostitute sues GGW for $10 million. GGW says, "But you consented." Prostitute says "No, I didn't." GGW digs up the video of her consenting, and says "Boo-yah."
GGW - 2, Prostitute - 0
Tape shows 'Kristen' OK with 'Girls Gone Wild' - msnbc.com
Video of consent - Gawker
4.30.2008
Spitzer Prostie Ashley Dupre gives drunken underage consent to Girls Gone Wild - Joe Francis says "I told you so."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Minors by law are not capable of giving legal consent. hth
Booya!
"I understand there is toplessness in this video, but no sexual conduct," Loyola Law School professor Stan Goldman told E! News. "The federal case in Florida, Lane v. MRA Holdings, that [GGW] are relying on would be relevant because this video was shot in Florida.
"This case defines what minors are precluded from consenting to and from the language it does not appear to preclude her from appearing topless as long as she is not paid."
A company rep said in a press release that Dupré signed the requisite paperwork before hopping aboard the GGW bus in 2003. Francis said that, in addition to topless shots of Dupré, he has tape of her kissing other girls.
"It would seem that he has a plausible legal argument to publish [the footage]," Goldman said. "I think he clearly has some cover in terms of prior case law. It would appear that he has a decent argument that she can consent to it even if she is under 18, which I understand they are not even sure that she was.
"This statute that they are referring to in this case lists 30 things that a minor cannot consent to and this [being topless] is not one of them."
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/detail.jsp?contentId=074cd5e1-971e-4a8a-8ce8-e18ce79d85dd
Post a Comment